View Full Version : Bokeh/depth of field Photo Thread
Marcus-SanDiego
11-02-2011, 09:45 PM
Let me give this a whirl.
One of the things that I look for is patterns (I'm always looking for repeating patterns). Here, you can see that the rings in the fence give me that. Additionally, the gate itself provides a repeating pattern. Similarly, look at the bricks on the building. You have repeating patterns there on both the right side and left side of my picture (even though I've blown out the background).
Further, I have focused on a particular ring on the fence. That one is in focus, while the rest of the rings are out of focus. Those out of focus rings serve as a frame for my in-focus ring. Same goes with the brick wall again. It serves as a frame for that in-focus ring as well (though the ring is much closer to the left-side bricks). Notice also that the rings are surrounded (top and bottom) by two long rails. Those frame the circles and help lead the viewer to my in-focus ring. The long rails also lead the viewer to the bokeh payoff on the right-hand side of the picture. Your eyes naturally follow the rings down toward the wall -- and right to the bokeh balls.
Meanwhile, I used an f/2.2 stop because I wanted the viewer to get some detail in the background. Even though I was using an f/1.4 lens, there was no need to shoot wide open. In fact, I rarely shoot wide open. Since I am close enough to my subject (the gate), I am going to get a nice blown out look anyhow. There is no point in shooting at f/1.4 (which often invites chromatic aberration and blows out my background completely). I also would have lost the background detail I was trying to preserve. When I was setting up my shot, I knew that I could get everything I needed at f/2.2. What's more, I've practiced enough to realize what my shot will look like at f/2.2. This is why I tell people it's so important to practice, practice, practice. You practice enough and you have a good idea of what your shot will look like before you ever shoot it. Still, after I took the shot, I still confirmed that I had the look I wanted. (I also wanted to make sure that the ugly sign on the blue door was blown out enough. It was.)
In post processing I shore up any compositional issues that weren't quite perfect straight out of camera. In this particular case, I cut a little bit of stuff off the left side of the picture (it was unnecessary) and I cut off a little bit off the right side of the shot (there was a lot of light over there that was distracting to me. I figured it would be distracting to my viewer, too).
Straight out of the camera, the picture lacked the warmth I preferred for this shot. As a result, I turned up the temperature just a bit. That did two things. One, it gave the bricks a bit more play in the picture and it gave me a nice reflection on the gate from the bricks.
Finally, I turned up the contrast just a bit, too, because I wanted the gate and bricks to be clearly separated. Ditto for my wall, which I wanted to be much brighter against my right side of the picture, which has shadows and green in it.
Believe it or not, there is probably more than that but I'll leave my analysis here. These are the major things I look at with a shot like this.
C Withers Media
11-02-2011, 09:55 PM
I think that is a perfectly logical explanation. Well done. Keep it up man and when you get a chance, teach me some of this stuff.
Marcus-SanDiego
11-02-2011, 10:11 PM
Haha. Sure. This is all of the stuff I learned from you and through my personal study during the past two months. I also took thousands of shots during that time period. There really is no substitute for practicing.
If you're waiting to be inspired, or have to wait for perfect conditions to shoot, you're going to fall behind. It's certainly easier to shoot in the early morning and at sunset but stuff happens between those time periods, too. If you haven't been practicing in difficult shooting conditions (as well as good conditions), you're going to get eaten up when you're forced to do it. I can shoot in the dark, light, fog, noon hour, sunset, sunrise, cloudy, overcast, you name it. Because of that, I can now concentrate on the specific shot at hand. I'm not worried about other things.
C Withers Media
11-03-2011, 10:47 PM
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6031/6311586204_d022286881_b.jpg
UdubBadger
11-04-2011, 05:16 AM
oooooh nice bokeh... and some grain... you traveling over 1600 ISO casey? ;)
Marcus-SanDiego
11-04-2011, 06:30 AM
I was out there with him, Seth. I am guessing over 1600 ISO on this one.
danewilson77
11-04-2011, 12:43 PM
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6212/6312730951_d27b838aa9_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6312730951/)
Severely Oppressed (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6312730951/) by Dane Wilson77 (http://www.flickr.com/people/dw77zhpmafia/), on Flickr
UdubBadger
11-04-2011, 03:10 PM
dane you hunt oak trees?
danewilson77
11-04-2011, 04:34 PM
dane you hunt oak trees?
There's a story behind that sign. It resides directly across from my driveway.
HTC Thunderbolt+TT
Marcus-SanDiego
11-04-2011, 06:36 PM
A little DOF.
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6110/6313903784_c38741b87f_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/zhpmafia/6313903784/)
Nikon 50mm f/1.4 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/zhpmafia/6313903784/) by Marky Marcus (http://www.flickr.com/people/zhpmafia/), on Flickr
danewilson77
11-04-2011, 06:38 PM
A little DOF.
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6110/6313903784_c38741b87f_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/zhpmafia/6313903784/)
Nikon 50mm f/1.4 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/zhpmafia/6313903784/) by Marky Marcus (http://www.flickr.com/people/zhpmafia/), on Flickr
Perfection. Awesome.
HTC Thunderbolt+TT
Marcus-SanDiego
11-04-2011, 06:40 PM
Fall colors in Southern California. Not quite winter yet.
danewilson77
11-04-2011, 06:42 PM
Fall colors in Southern California. Not quite winter yet.
Hehe. Officially is that when temp plummet to 75*?
HTC Thunderbolt+TT
Washburn
11-04-2011, 09:30 PM
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b176/nishang/DSC_0490.jpg
UdubBadger
11-05-2011, 08:43 AM
awesome shots guys
danewilson77
11-05-2011, 02:38 PM
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6041/6315951251_03dc46b238_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6315951251/)
Not All There 2 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6315951251/) by Dane Wilson77 (http://www.flickr.com/people/dw77zhpmafia/), on Flickr
danewilson77
11-05-2011, 02:38 PM
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6118/6315950605_5d3f5c0970_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6315950605/)
New Town Ball (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6315950605/) by Dane Wilson77 (http://www.flickr.com/people/dw77zhpmafia/), on Flickr
danewilson77
11-05-2011, 02:39 PM
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6216/6316466460_ec189e8da2_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6316466460/)
New Town Bench (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6316466460/) by Dane Wilson77 (http://www.flickr.com/people/dw77zhpmafia/), on Flickr
danewilson77
11-05-2011, 02:40 PM
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6100/6315946995_ca4e8c8f34_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6315946995/)
Mr Adams (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6315946995/) by Dane Wilson77 (http://www.flickr.com/people/dw77zhpmafia/), on Flickr
imola red zhp
11-05-2011, 02:43 PM
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6041/6315951251_03dc46b238_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6315951251/)
Not All There 2 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6315951251/) by Dane Wilson77 (http://www.flickr.com/people/dw77zhpmafia/), on Flickr
I like this one, nice one step closer to pulling trigger on Nikon 5100.....LOL
Hornung418
11-05-2011, 03:11 PM
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6041/6315951251_03dc46b238_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6315951251/)
Not All There 2 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6315951251/) by Dane Wilson77 (http://www.flickr.com/people/dw77zhpmafia/), on Flickr
Making us proud, Dane! You put that fence right in the corner :biggrin
C Withers Media
11-05-2011, 05:55 PM
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6115/6316475983_1b6435a105_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/cwithersmedia/6316475983/)
Temecula Rain 127 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/cwithersmedia/6316475983/) by C Withers Media (http://www.flickr.com/people/cwithersmedia/), on Flickr
jreyes19
11-05-2011, 06:32 PM
is that one of those walls of glass cubes or shiny tile?
i like it, was there extensive editing to get that bend in the picture?
C Withers Media
11-05-2011, 06:43 PM
It is glass tiles and it was arched like that.
UdubBadger
11-06-2011, 06:19 AM
Nice CW
danewilson77
11-06-2011, 06:33 AM
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6053/6318601782_f20f965af4_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6318601782/)
New Town Rack (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6318601782/) by Dane Wilson77 (http://www.flickr.com/people/dw77zhpmafia/), on Flickr
UdubBadger
11-06-2011, 12:25 PM
very nice DOF and B&W toning Dane. Which lens and what aperture did you shoot that at?
danewilson77
11-06-2011, 12:45 PM
I was wide open, using kit lens (18-55)
HTC Thunderbolt+TT
UdubBadger
11-06-2011, 04:07 PM
hmmm cuz your zoom looks like its around 40-50mm which would mean it's only like f/5 or f/5.6. thats a LOT of bokeh for f/5.6
Marcus-SanDiego
11-06-2011, 04:14 PM
From the Exif data:
Exposure 0.001 sec (1/800)
Aperture f/4.5
Focal Length 70 mm
ISO Speed 100
Focal Length In 35mm Format 105 mm
Lens 70.0-300.0 mm f/4.5-5.6
C Withers Media
11-06-2011, 05:32 PM
Nice CW
thanks
danewilson77
11-06-2011, 05:35 PM
From the Exif data:
Exposure 0.001 sec (1/800)
Aperture f/4.5
Focal Length 70 mm
ISO Speed 100
Focal Length In 35mm Format 105 mm
Lens 70.0-300.0 mm f/4.5-5.6
Makes sense, no? It was the lense I brought.
HTC Thunderbolt+TT
Kit lens? OMG people still use those!?!?!?
I hate it when people throw their kit lenses in the garbage. Just because it came with the camera, doesn't mean it cannot take good pictures.
DW = +1 Skill Point.
danewilson77
11-06-2011, 06:20 PM
Pic above....was with 70-300mm lens. Not kit lens. I do not raise my nose at my kit lense.
HTC Thunderbolt+TT
C Withers Media
11-06-2011, 06:38 PM
I shot with my kit lense for the first two years I owned a camera. Even until just a few weeks ago, I was using "inferior" lenses. I almost miss them sometimes as it can be quite rewarding to whip out an $80 piece of glass and do work.
I was wide open, using kit lens (18-55)
HTC Thunderbolt+TT
Pic above....was with 70-300mm lens. Not kit lens. I do not raise my nose at my kit lense.
HTC Thunderbolt+TT
Should have quoted earlier. My bad.
UdubBadger
11-06-2011, 07:23 PM
From the Exif data:
Exposure 0.001 sec (1/800)
Aperture f/4.5
Focal Length 70 mm
ISO Speed 100
Focal Length In 35mm Format 105 mm
Lens 70.0-300.0 mm f/4.5-5.6
that would make a bit more sense cuz the aperture would be lower @ 70mm and you'll get a little more bokeh cuz its a tele lens
UdubBadger
11-06-2011, 07:24 PM
I shot with my kit lense for the first two years I owned a camera. Even until just a few weeks ago, I was using "inferior" lenses. I almost miss them sometimes as it can be quite rewarding to whip out an $80 piece of glass and do work.
50mm 1.8 ;)
C Withers Media
11-07-2011, 10:54 PM
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6059/6323223407_66c2133272_b.jpg
danewilson77
11-08-2011, 02:14 PM
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6042/6327253764_ab3588ccd8_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6327253764/)
York Coastline No Fishing (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6327253764/) by Dane Wilson77 (http://www.flickr.com/people/dw77zhpmafia/), on Flickr
UdubBadger
11-08-2011, 02:31 PM
way to use that corner dane
danewilson77
11-08-2011, 02:49 PM
way to use that corner dane
Lol....I heard that somewhere.
HTC Thunderbolt+TT
danewilson77
11-09-2011, 04:45 PM
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6218/6330623074_510bbc0e35_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6330623074/)
Waller Mill Park Leaf (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6330623074/) by Dane Wilson77 (http://www.flickr.com/people/dw77zhpmafia/), on Flickr
danewilson77
11-09-2011, 04:45 PM
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6019/6329883659_5f67f17f1d_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6329883659/)
Waller Mill Park Bridgekeh (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6329883659/) by Dane Wilson77 (http://www.flickr.com/people/dw77zhpmafia/), on Flickr
UdubBadger
11-10-2011, 06:51 AM
nice, I like the bridge shot
danewilson77
11-21-2011, 04:52 PM
http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6110/6380064049_004b1b688d_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6380064049/)
Chico ridin the wax (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6380064049/) by Dane Wilson77 (http://www.flickr.com/people/dw77zhpmafia/), on Flickr
UdubBadger
11-21-2011, 05:59 PM
da bulls
Not as fancy as most of yours, but a few of mine:
http://i.imgur.com/ISIGo.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/WLNLv.jpg
jreyes19
11-22-2011, 01:47 PM
Not as fancy as most of yours, but a few of mine:
http://i.imgur.com/ISIGo.jpg
My only issue with this picture is why in the world is the Corona in the back :(
lol nice pics
My only issue with this picture is why in the world is the Corona in the back :(
lol nice pics
Coronas were evenly distributed throughout the duration of the "civilized get-together."
jreyes19
11-23-2011, 11:27 AM
Ok guys I have never shot Bokeh before so I hope i have somewhat of a grasp on this
There is no editing to this photo, it is fresh off the Camera (not sure in which direction to go editing this picture)
but is this truly Bokeh??
also please critique it, be as honest as possible I want to learn :)
http://i1209.photobucket.com/albums/cc385/jreyes19/d5100/Flower.jpg
C Withers Media
11-23-2011, 11:50 AM
Yes, it truly is bokeh. The focus on the flower seems a little soft though. There is some sort of white strand coming off of the flower that is pretty distracting, and the little buds coming off of the stem below the flower take away a lot for me. Other than that, the rule of thirds is in effect, subject is interesting enough, and you got the desired effect in the background. Keep shooting and mess around with it in post a little bit.
UdubBadger
11-23-2011, 02:36 PM
when shooting macro or non macro close ups like that one... I tend to turn my AF off and go manual focus to really make sure its sharp. Not a rule by any means cuz a lot of lenses will help you out if you are too close and not AF so you can't actually hit the shutter but I like to be in control of that stuff when shooting with such a small DOF.
jreyes19
11-23-2011, 07:46 PM
it was shot in manual mode, i am new to all of this so i hear the best thing is to leave it off of AF
Guess i need to work on my focusing more
also updated picture with some editing
UdubBadger
11-23-2011, 08:07 PM
yeah really make sure you get it focused well. not sure bout your camera but mine also has the little dial to focus the view finder so make sure you got that set up properly too, especially with AF off.
jreyes19
11-23-2011, 08:23 PM
I have the Nikon d5100
I will keep attempting to focus manually hopefully to progress both in speed and accuracy
C Withers Media
11-23-2011, 08:27 PM
I have the Nikon d5100
I will keep attempting to focus manually hopefully to progress both in speed and accuracy
As Seth mentioned, make sure your diopter is locked in and focused properly or manual focus of the lens will be next to impossible.
danewilson77
11-23-2011, 09:20 PM
As Seth mentioned, make sure your diopter is locked in and focused properly or manual focus of the lens will be next to impossible.
Yes....the Ummmmm...diopter....of course.....must be locked in.....yes.
HTC Thunderbolt+TT
C Withers Media
11-23-2011, 10:49 PM
LOL, it's in the manual Dane. It's the adjustment with a plus or minus sign near your eye piece that ensures you see things clearly in your view finder. For example, Mark has horrible vision without his glasses and I have 20/15 after corrective surgery. I cannot see a darn thing through his viewfinder.
jreyes19
11-23-2011, 11:31 PM
Lol i will be adjusting it next time i pull out the camera, most likely for some thanksgiving photos :)
Thanks for the help guys
I really do appreciate it
BTW I now know a new word "Diopter" now to figure out how to squeeze it into a conversation
Marcus-SanDiego
11-24-2011, 06:04 AM
LOL, it's in the manual Dane. It's the adjustment with a plus or minus sign near your eye piece that ensures you see things clearly in your view finder. For example, Mark has horrible vision without his glasses and I have 20/15 after corrective surgery. I cannot see a darn thing through his viewfinder.
Don't let Casey fool you. I have tremendous vision. :biggrin
UdubBadger
11-24-2011, 06:54 AM
hahaha, never knew what it was called either.
Marcus-SanDiego
11-24-2011, 06:57 AM
Lol i will be adjusting it next time i pull out the camera, most likely for some thanksgiving photos :)
Thanks for the help guys
I really do appreciate it
BTW I now know a new word "Diopter" now to figure out how to squeeze it into a conversation
Easy enough to weave in, too.
You: "While I was adjusting my diopter, I couldn't help but notice you from across the room, Beautiful. Would you like to come to my house for a cup of coffee?"
Works every time!
:chuck
danewilson77
11-24-2011, 07:40 AM
LOL, it's in the manual Dane. It's the adjustment with a plus or minus sign near your eye piece that ensures you see things clearly in your view finder. For example, Mark has horrible vision without his glasses and I have 20/15 after corrective surgery. I cannot see a darn thing through his viewfinder.
Yeah! Of course I knew that....jeesh.
Lol i will be adjusting it next time i pull out the camera, most likely for some thanksgiving photos :)
Thanks for the help guys
I really do appreciate it
BTW I now know a new word "Diopter" now to figure out how to squeeze it into a conversation
Psssst....me too. Shhhhhh
UdubBadger
11-24-2011, 08:09 AM
Easy enough to weave in, too.
You: "While I was adjusting my diopter, I couldn't help but notice you from across the room, Beautiful. Would you like to come to my house for a cup of coffee?"
Works every time!
:chuck
DAAAAAAAMN. Smooth move x-lax.
imola red zhp
11-24-2011, 08:39 AM
DAAAAAAAMN. Smooth move x-lax.
LOL....
Marcus-SanDiego
11-24-2011, 09:21 AM
DAAAAAAAMN. Smooth move x-lax.
:biggrin
Marcus-SanDiego
11-24-2011, 05:26 PM
I decided to bring the cream machine out today.
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7030/6397452351_79ee2dbf7a_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/zhpmafia/6397452351/)
Nikon 85mm f/1.4 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/zhpmafia/6397452351/) by Marky Marcus (http://www.flickr.com/people/zhpmafia/), on Flickr
UdubBadger
11-24-2011, 07:35 PM
OMG I just spit out food... that was HILARIOUS
Marcus-SanDiego
11-24-2011, 08:21 PM
Seth, what was hilarious?
UdubBadger
11-24-2011, 08:47 PM
the cream machine.... (maybe I took that way more immature than I was supposed to)
Marcus-SanDiego
11-24-2011, 09:46 PM
Haha. The Nikon 85mm f/1.4 lens is known as the cream machine because of the bokeh it produces.
UdubBadger
11-25-2011, 08:09 AM
yep... just my immaturity then. :)
Hornung418
11-25-2011, 04:16 PM
I'm with you, Seth...I own a cream machine...but not a camera...how does that work out? ;)
Found this on Reddit:
http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lv1rszToLz1qa9omho1_500.jpg
danewilson77
11-25-2011, 07:53 PM
Cool pic Kerunt.
danewilson77
11-27-2011, 01:24 PM
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7017/6413872149_d1d690ebb9_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6413872149/)
Williamsburg Tracks II (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6413872149/) by Dane Wilson77 (http://www.flickr.com/people/dw77zhpmafia/), on Flickr
UdubBadger
11-27-2011, 03:23 PM
nice shot DW
danewilson77
11-27-2011, 03:24 PM
Thanks Badger....was hoping a train would come by.......kinda.
UdubBadger
11-27-2011, 03:27 PM
hahaha be careful
Hornung418
11-28-2011, 09:13 AM
Great shot, Dane.
jreyes19
11-28-2011, 09:15 AM
awesome shot love that it is in black and white as well
danewilson77
11-28-2011, 09:55 AM
Great shot, Dane.
awesome shot love that it is in black and white as well
Thanks!
Rovert
12-09-2011, 02:48 AM
Got a new camera to play with!! This one is taken at 28mm F3.5 with the onboard flash bounced up against the ceiling. I want to get the 40mm 1.7 pancake lens for this camera when the budget comes around.
http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/8372/p1000263a.jpg
UdubBadger
12-09-2011, 06:03 AM
nice, like the angle too
Marcus-SanDiego
12-09-2011, 07:26 AM
I like the lighting, Trev. Nice.
danewilson77
12-09-2011, 04:27 PM
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7141/6484262777_92da021ff2_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6484262777/)
Vanos Timing chain bokeh (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6484262777/) by Dane Wilson77 (http://www.flickr.com/people/dw77zhpmafia/), on Flickr
Rovert
12-09-2011, 05:19 PM
Didn't this thread used to be just for Bokeh? And excuse me since I'm chinese...how do you pronounce Bokeh? LOL Is that German??
Marcus-SanDiego
12-09-2011, 06:41 PM
I believe that bokeh is Japanese.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
danewilson77
12-09-2011, 06:57 PM
Didn't this thread used to be just for Bokeh? And excuse me since I'm chinese...how do you pronounce Bokeh? LOL Is that German??
Is it not being used just for bokeh?
HTC Thunderbolt+TT
Rovert
12-09-2011, 07:12 PM
Boe-cah? Boke? Bouquet? Boekee? Bock? How do you say it? LOL
danewilson77
12-09-2011, 07:26 PM
Boe-cah? Boke? Bouquet? Boekee? Bock? How do you say it? LOL
I've been saying it like #1.
HTC Thunderbolt+TT
Rovert
12-09-2011, 07:40 PM
I just made it speak on google translate. She said it like Boca Raton. LOL.
UdubBadger
12-09-2011, 08:49 PM
yeah you don't elongate the h
johnnyrad
12-13-2011, 03:01 PM
Ok finally got my camara back from being repaired. So are these Bokeh??
http://i1092.photobucket.com/albums/i401/bslotterbach/DSC_0225.jpg
http://i1092.photobucket.com/albums/i401/bslotterbach/DSC_0222.jpg
http://i1092.photobucket.com/albums/i401/bslotterbach/DSC_0221.jpg
danewilson77
12-13-2011, 03:24 PM
Yessiree
HTC Thunderbolt+TT
UdubBadger
12-13-2011, 03:37 PM
yeah, more so depth of field demo IMO but that discussion shall remain in the 1st few pages of the thread.
johnnyrad
12-13-2011, 03:38 PM
Sweet! I can duh eeeet...
:)
Marcus-SanDiego
12-13-2011, 04:38 PM
Nice depth of field.
danewilson77
12-13-2011, 04:57 PM
Ok finally got my camara back from being repaired. So are these Bokeh??
Yup. I'm fucked up. That's shallow depth of field upon further dissection of the definition.
"Coming from the Japanese word boke meaning "blur" or "haze", or boke-aji, bokeh is "the way the lens renders out-of-focus points of light""
My bust Johnny
johnnyrad
12-13-2011, 05:02 PM
Ohhhh Noooooooo I can't do it after all!
Yep no points of light going on there. Total bust DW...hehehe..I must focus and try harder.
johnnyrad
12-13-2011, 05:08 PM
Oh yea forgot equipment. Can't remember the ap or f stop as I suck right now and just getting into this. But taken with a Nikon D3000 with 18-55mm lens with a +4 / 52 mm magnifying lens slapped on the end of that bad boy. Wifey says a real macro lens is mucho money and the little screw on filter's are good enough for me. (She graduated from RIT so I will listen to her on the camera portion of our marriage.) :)
C Withers Media
12-13-2011, 05:34 PM
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7160/6508251055_b6ba4d25fe_z.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/cwithersmedia/6508251055/)
Hamilton portraits 228 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/cwithersmedia/6508251055/) by C Withers Media (http://www.flickr.com/people/cwithersmedia/), on Flickr
johnnyrad
12-13-2011, 05:49 PM
Very nice. I would venture to say that has a point of light.
kayger12
12-13-2011, 06:20 PM
http://i1234.photobucket.com/albums/ff401/Kayger12/IMG_7730_edited-1.jpg
danewilson77
12-13-2011, 06:27 PM
Great pic KG. Girls lookin happy!
HTC Thunderbolt+TT
kayger12
12-13-2011, 06:48 PM
Thanks, brother.
Droid X. Tapatalk. Use it.
Marcus-SanDiego
12-13-2011, 07:25 PM
Great shots, guys.
kayger12
12-13-2011, 07:28 PM
Thanks, sir.
Droid X. Tapatalk. Use it.
Another Reddit score:
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-plTIiED0GVA/Tua2gPzotkI/AAAAAAAAMno/2BkyUS1D6zw/s640/5215873104_1a714bda8b_z.jpg
Rovert
12-13-2011, 11:17 PM
I want!! I want to pet!! awwwwwww
danewilson77
12-17-2011, 04:42 PM
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7161/6528455613_0108d2c52b_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6528455613/)
Newtown Love is in the Air (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6528455613/) by Dane Wilson77 (http://www.flickr.com/people/dw77zhpmafia/), on Flickr
UdubBadger
12-17-2011, 05:14 PM
nice dane. hack off that other side of the pole (left) and call it a "framing" technique
Marcus-SanDiego
12-17-2011, 11:07 PM
Casey was busy playing in the water. Left his flip flops behind.
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7005/6529745099_d0bf8325ae_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/zhpmafia/6529745099/)
Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/zhpmafia/6529745099/) by Marky Marcus (http://www.flickr.com/people/zhpmafia/), on Flickr
Rovert
12-17-2011, 11:16 PM
Haha....Casey was canonballing!
Marcus-SanDiego
12-17-2011, 11:37 PM
haha.
danewilson77
12-18-2011, 05:46 AM
Great shot Boss. Love it.
HTC Thunderbolt+TT
Marcus-SanDiego
12-18-2011, 06:58 AM
Thanks, DW.
Marcus-SanDiego
12-18-2011, 07:17 AM
Liz Hutton's tools of the trade. This was part of her set up at the shoot yesterday.
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7167/6529540315_e1013886a7_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/zhpmafia/6529540315/)
Nikon 105mm f/2.8 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/zhpmafia/6529540315/) by Marky Marcus (http://www.flickr.com/people/zhpmafia/), on Flickr
http://www.thetripatorium.com/images/uploads/noah1.jpg
danewilson77
12-18-2011, 12:26 PM
http://www.thetripatorium.com/images/uploads/noah1.jpg
Dang kerunt...those colors fly off the screen. Where did you make that capture?
UdubBadger
12-18-2011, 01:16 PM
wow yeah they are awesome, nice shot
Dang kerunt...those colors fly off the screen. Where did you make that capture?
Not my shot; another pic I found on reddit!
Hornung418
12-18-2011, 01:31 PM
Make sure you link the source then :)
danewilson77
12-18-2011, 01:49 PM
Not my shot; another pic I found on reddit!
That, and the thread is for pics taken by members. If the pic inspires you....you can place it in this thread below...
http://www.zhpmafia.com/forums/showthread.php?4876-Links-to-photos-that-give-you-inspiration-or-awe-NO-CARS
C Withers Media
12-18-2011, 03:23 PM
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7017/6534149983_d1b243c34e_b.jpg
Marcus-SanDiego
12-18-2011, 03:50 PM
Nice. ^^ Love the orange bokeh.
Marcus-SanDiego
12-18-2011, 08:22 PM
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7030/6535657909_8e07021654_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/zhpmafia/6535657909/)
Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/zhpmafia/6535657909/) by Marky Marcus (http://www.flickr.com/people/zhpmafia/), on Flickr
UdubBadger
12-19-2011, 01:14 PM
nice ones CW and marcus.
marcus you should smooshed a quarter into the tire ;)
Rovert
12-19-2011, 01:22 PM
!!!!!! ^ What he said.
Marcus-SanDiego
12-19-2011, 01:55 PM
Haha. I should have.
UdubBadger
12-19-2011, 07:40 PM
or some juicy fruit...
actually scratch that, don't waste the juicy fruit.
danewilson77
12-20-2011, 01:55 PM
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7149/6545690671_061f918f77_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6545690671/)
E46 Serp Tensioner Bolt (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6545690671/) by Dane Wilson77 (http://www.flickr.com/people/dw77zhpmafia/), on Flickr
Meric
12-21-2011, 07:46 AM
Wow dane looks like some car magazine cover! :) Is that an e90?
az3579
12-21-2011, 08:32 AM
Wow dane looks like some car magazine cover! :) Is that an e90?
It could be an E90, E92, or E93 M3. Same front end.
Sent from my iPhone 4S with Tapatalk
UdubBadger
12-21-2011, 09:14 AM
that promo is most likely a Melbourne red e92 M3... seen it 100 times
danewilson77
12-21-2011, 10:17 AM
I just like tools, and parts and such.....
Thought I would try to practice Shallow DOF shot with the Tensioner bolt I just got. Lighting limited. Used flash....but when it was full on....it washed out detail on the bolt......so....I shielded maybe 50% of the flash with my hand. Just playin around....
Thought the backdrop was cool....
UdubBadger
12-21-2011, 04:07 PM
finger diffuser... done that before. Nice work DW
Rovert
12-21-2011, 04:19 PM
Did you burn your finger? :P
http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/7363/p1010137d.jpg
I know I didn't.
UdubBadger
12-21-2011, 04:59 PM
Ah, bringing back memories of the Kids in the Hall.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pKXMcfx1d8
Rovert
12-21-2011, 05:27 PM
Wow...can I please bill you 3 minutes and 40 seconds of my life? LOL
UdubBadger
12-21-2011, 09:08 PM
you only needed to see the first 17 sec to know what I was talking about :p
imola red zhp
12-22-2011, 07:51 AM
Just trying this out
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7010/6552809155_6201157d38_z.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/18128055@N03/6552809155/)
IMG_0434 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/18128055@N03/6552809155/) by da94450 (http://www.flickr.com/people/18128055@N03/), on Flickr
UdubBadger
12-22-2011, 09:03 AM
and you succeeded. Nice work.
imola red zhp
12-22-2011, 09:06 AM
Thanks Seth finally......haha
jreyes19
01-17-2012, 08:22 AM
http://i1209.photobucket.com/albums/cc385/jreyes19/DSC_0753copy.jpg
UdubBadger
01-17-2012, 08:11 PM
nice work
johnrando
01-17-2012, 09:43 PM
Very cool depth of field shot!
Rovert
01-17-2012, 09:59 PM
I just saw John in a San Fran Go Pro video! :D Now I kinda have a face to the name....LOL.
My client is getting me a prime 20mm F1.7 for my baby 4/3's camera. Hope I can get some nice bokeh out of that lens!
johnrando
01-17-2012, 10:18 PM
LOL. Sweet lens, looking forward to seeing pics with it.
Rovert
01-18-2012, 09:02 PM
LOL. Sweet lens, looking forward to seeing pics with it.
Here's a pic with it on? LOL
http://img.tapatalk.com/ae01e8b2-a3ee-eb86.jpg
---
I am here: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=49.250880,-122.825350
Hornung418
01-18-2012, 09:13 PM
That lens is so tiny!
Rovert
01-18-2012, 11:53 PM
That lens is so tiny!
It's not about the size...but what you do with it. This quote applies here and she would agree. LOL
http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/6692/p1020170u.jpg
http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/3584/p1020166o.jpg
http://img804.imageshack.us/img804/2063/p1020164z.jpg
http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/6901/p1020148j.jpg
These were all taken at F1.7. It's so tough to manual focus when up close because when I move just a mm....focus can go out! Wow....this is going to be fun to work with!
UdubBadger
01-19-2012, 06:42 AM
nice work trevor
Hornung418
01-19-2012, 09:20 AM
Very nice shots, Trev. Diggin the new watermark for this year :)
Rovert
01-19-2012, 10:49 AM
I'm excited to take more pics with this lens. I love the depth of field with it a lot. I couldn't stop taking pictures until 3am last night. LOL.
Rovert
01-19-2012, 08:54 PM
OMG! :eyetwitch
I'm loving this new lens!!!
http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/415/p1020306n.jpg
UdubBadger
01-19-2012, 08:55 PM
nice wafer thin DOF
Rovert
01-19-2012, 08:58 PM
I can't wait to take portraits with this! Gonna use it to do video interviews so the subject should be nice and clear to look at them while a lambo doing a burnout behind won't cause one loss of face attention. LOL
johnrando
01-20-2012, 10:02 AM
Such cool stuff. Great lens, but it's the photographer that makes it work. Nice pics Trevor!
M0nk3y
01-20-2012, 01:16 PM
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7170/6656741781_de7a45be2b_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/m0nk3yy31/6656741781/)
Day at the Range (http://www.flickr.com/photos/m0nk3yy31/6656741781/) by M0nk3yy31 (http://www.flickr.com/people/m0nk3yy31/), on Flickr
UdubBadger
01-20-2012, 03:04 PM
very cool
Heading to the annual Vancouver Motorcycle show today so that I can play around with my new 50mm F1.8 lens! Expect to see some shots!
johnrando
01-20-2012, 05:25 PM
very cool
+1
Here's one from the bike show:
http://i.imgur.com/ILMjb.jpg
Hornung418
01-21-2012, 10:10 AM
Awesome composition. Good bokeh and crisp colors! You should crop the tag out of the pic tho.
UdubBadger
01-21-2012, 02:14 PM
i disagree, i think you shoulda shot it with the tag all the way in, gives it a certain feel like they line um all up and ship um all out as fast as they can, everything is for sale. I would also maybe suggest shooting at a HIGHER fstop so the focus isn't just 1 bike in, the rest out but more so 1 bike the main focus, then gradually going more out of focus for a bit of stronger play on the repetition.
Interesting feedback guys, thanks. This was just me playing around with my new Canon 50mm F1.8 lens. Loving it so far! All pics are at: http://imgur.com/a/GJQBm
danewilson77
01-22-2012, 11:39 AM
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7168/6744947175_94752a0536_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6744947175/)
HTC Thunderbolt (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dw77zhpmafia/6744947175/) by Dane Wilson77 (http://www.flickr.com/people/dw77zhpmafia/), on Flickr
UdubBadger
01-22-2012, 12:42 PM
nice dane
danewilson77
01-22-2012, 12:58 PM
nice dane
Thanks
Rovert
01-22-2012, 01:16 PM
Yup that's danerific!
danewilson77
01-22-2012, 02:14 PM
Yup that's danerific!
Thanks Trevor.
Marcus-SanDiego
01-22-2012, 02:37 PM
Yup that's danerific!
:like
Hornung418
01-31-2012, 04:13 PM
Am I doin it right?
3180
3181
3182
Rovert
01-31-2012, 04:18 PM
Doing great...now all you need is some content that can tell a thousand words! Get your dog looking at the camera. I know it's hard to do that. I was shooting a dog last week! If he's sleeping that's even better. You need to get his face in full calmness then have something that'll be blurred in the background to go with the sleeping beauty! :D That's only one example of millions.....happy shooting!
Hornung418
01-31-2012, 04:22 PM
He was passed out from playing with all the wrapping paper LOL
That was my time shooting with a DSLR. Thanks for the comments, Trev!
danewilson77
01-31-2012, 04:24 PM
Laaag........................resize please.
Rovert
01-31-2012, 04:28 PM
That was my time shooting with a DSLR. Thanks for the comments, Trev!
Do you have a hot shoe flash or were you using the camera's onboard flash? Try finding a way to bounce the light from the ceiling to create a more desirable effect. :)
Hornung418
01-31-2012, 04:46 PM
Laaag........................resize please.
I don't know how they're lagging the thread...They show up fine on my end :dunno
Do you have a hot shoe flash or were you using the camera's onboard flash? Try finding a way to bounce the light from the ceiling to create a more desirable effect. :)
I need to get batteries for my Sonicflash, but I've been using the on board flash. Need to use it with the Manual Lens as the camera displays, "Subject is to dark to register."
danewilson77
01-31-2012, 04:52 PM
I can see them fine...Your pics are 2.5ish Mb......that's the reason. If you resize them......it will help with pic loading.
Resize to 1024 X ??? and they will load perfectly...
johnrando
02-18-2014, 06:56 AM
Bump
Sent from my DROID4 using Tapatalk 2
M0nk3y
02-18-2014, 03:22 PM
I guess this applies a bit...
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5498/10431402455_0b64c1f66d_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/m0nk3yy31/10431402455/)
Maverick (http://www.flickr.com/photos/m0nk3yy31/10431402455/) by M0nk3yy31 (http://www.flickr.com/people/m0nk3yy31/), on Flickr
ELCID86
02-18-2014, 03:32 PM
^certainly does. Focus seems to be spot on--his eyes.
KevinC
02-18-2014, 05:52 PM
http://www.kcphotodump.net/Travel/Bisbee-January-2014/i-4sP2C2t/0/X2/DSC_0213-X2.jpg
http://www.kcphotodump.net/Travel/Bisbee-January-2014/i-zPpMC9S/0/X2/DSC_0214-X2.jpg
UdubBadger
02-18-2014, 09:59 PM
Bout to be going bokeh HAM in a few weeks
Goin' HAM mobile
cakM3
02-20-2014, 05:25 AM
I'm still working to improve in this area....here's what I got to contribute :)
http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/02/20/ave4uju3.jpg
http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/02/20/aza6u6y7.jpg
http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/02/20/yda8eged.jpg
http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/02/20/7u8ubyse.jpg
NorCal-Dimitri
02-20-2014, 09:08 AM
I'm still working to improve in this area....here's what I got to contribute :)
http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/02/20/ave4uju3.jpg
Love this one! :thumbup
poke08
02-20-2014, 11:59 AM
I shot this with my 50mm 1.4d at 2.8 on a d7000.
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c356/jonfuller8/DSC_1959_zpsf6cf722e.jpg (http://s31.photobucket.com/user/jonfuller8/media/DSC_1959_zpsf6cf722e.jpg.html)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
UdubBadger
02-20-2014, 09:40 PM
Just to be clear guys - DOF is not always bokeh (which is a Japanese term for the small round reflections of light in a shallow DOF photo).
Secondly, shallow DOF is not just achieved by shooting at your lowest f stop, even though that makes the most difference. Focal length, distance to subject and even lens length to the sensor of the camera all come into play.
If you have an iPhone I highly recommend the app called Photobuddy. It has some calculations on DOF and other camera functions. Good stuff.
Goin' HAM mobile
johnrando
02-20-2014, 10:58 PM
Nice pics in there. Good advice Seth.
cakM3
02-21-2014, 04:25 AM
Love this one! :thumbup
Thanks!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
ELCID86
02-24-2014, 08:12 AM
12484
johnrando
02-24-2014, 08:17 AM
:like
danewilson77
02-24-2014, 08:24 AM
:like
+1
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
Avetiso
03-01-2014, 05:49 PM
Does this count at all? The signs in the back look round.
http://i1319.photobucket.com/albums/t662/Avetiso/Shamelessly%20Dirty/PICT0101_zps43ca3517.jpg (http://s1319.photobucket.com/user/Avetiso/media/Shamelessly%20Dirty/PICT0101_zps43ca3517.jpg.html)
UdubBadger
03-01-2014, 06:13 PM
This is bokeh
12577
A lot of these are showing DOF so that's fine but just want to clear up what bokeh actually is. That's like calling every dog you see a German Shepard. All Shepards are dogs as all bokeh is DOF. But not all dogs are Shepards as not all DOF is bokeh.
Make sense?
Goin' HAM mobile
Avetiso
03-01-2014, 06:17 PM
This is bokeh
12577
A lot of these are showing DOF so that's fine but just want to clear up what bokeh actually is. That's like calling every dog you see a German Shepard. All Shepards are dogs as all bokeh is DOF. But not all dogs are Shepards as not all DOF is bokeh.
Make sense?
Goin' HAM mobile
Perfect. Thanks for clearing that up, Seth!
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
cakM3
03-01-2014, 06:33 PM
This is bokeh
12577
A lot of these are showing DOF so that's fine but just want to clear up what bokeh actually is. That's like calling every dog you see a German Shepard. All Shepards are dogs as all bokeh is DOF. But not all dogs are Shepards as not all DOF is bokeh.
Make sense?
Goin' HAM mobile
Seth, that picture is amazing! Thanks for explaining Bokeh :thumbsup
UdubBadger
03-01-2014, 08:01 PM
No worries guys. Keep those pics coming!
Goin' HAM mobile
ELCID86
03-03-2014, 04:12 PM
DOF
12628
Thumbs, iPhone, Tapatalk.
328ioc
03-03-2014, 06:37 PM
12484
This view right here is one of the few things making me still slightly consider and SMG when I buy an M3
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
danewilson77
03-03-2014, 06:40 PM
DOF
12628
Thumbs, iPhone, Tapatalk.
Nice.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
UdubBadger
03-05-2014, 05:08 AM
This view right here is one of the few things making me still slightly consider and SMG when I buy an M3
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
Well let me show you my friends bill on his SMG pump repairs and it will instantly talk you out of it...
Goin' HAM mobile
Well let me show you my friends bill on his SMG pump repairs and it will instantly talk you out of it...
Goin' HAM mobile
An SMG -> 6 Speed swap runs about a grand. After driving one, I wouldn't hesitate to buy an SMG, especially since they're usually $2-3k cheaper than comparable 6-speeds.
UdubBadger
03-06-2014, 05:06 AM
The swap from what I've seen runs a grand... In labor. Don't forget you need to buy the trans - if you can find one that doesn't need a rebuild.
Goin' HAM mobile
danewilson77
03-06-2014, 05:15 AM
I thought this was bokeh thread :)
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
UdubBadger
03-06-2014, 07:55 AM
Hahaha oh relax it is a car forum :p
Goin' HAM mobile
NoVAphotog
03-06-2014, 08:31 AM
All DoF/bokeh examples. First three at 135mm f/2 last at 400mm f/2.8. :shift :guns2
12686
12687
12690
12688
johnrando
03-06-2014, 08:32 AM
Very nice!
cakM3
03-06-2014, 08:44 AM
DOF
http://i395.photobucket.com/albums/pp37/macdctr/SPIDER_zps6c933555.jpg
Thumbs, iPhone, Tapatalk.
This has BP written all over it. Great picture!
UdubBadger
03-06-2014, 03:37 PM
Tree bokeh is my fav
Goin' HAM mobile
danewilson77
03-06-2014, 06:35 PM
Those are great examples.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
ELCID86
03-22-2014, 10:47 AM
Good article: http://fstoppers.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-bokeh
ELCID86
03-23-2014, 09:06 AM
13001
13002
13003
danewilson77
03-23-2014, 09:07 AM
Nice Shawn.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
gmurphy
03-23-2014, 09:20 AM
Nice Shawn.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
+1 those are great
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.