GoGators
02-24-2015, 03:41 AM
writing this in hopes it will help someone else along the way...
I was very skeptical that a MAF (mass air flow sensor) could fail and still be provide ODBII data that appeared appropriate throughout the RPM range. well, I am skeptical no more.
I was getting an occasional lean condition code, bank 1 and bank 2 (P0171, P0174). over the course of a few months i changed the upper and lower boots, all vacuum lines, fuel filter, disa valve, cleaned the MAF, smoked the intake, replaced the CCV and hoses with no success... when I check my fuel trim, my Long Term trims were steady at ~ 10-14 throughout the RPM range.
when I replaced the MAF and put ~40 miles on it, my fuel trims are holding steady at ~ 1, success!!
so yes, a MAF can definitely soft-fail and appear as though it is working just fine when you observe the live data feed readings on your OBDII scanner. mine was apparently ~10% off throughout the rpm range, very precise, but not accurate (for all you engineers)!!!!!
I was very skeptical that a MAF (mass air flow sensor) could fail and still be provide ODBII data that appeared appropriate throughout the RPM range. well, I am skeptical no more.
I was getting an occasional lean condition code, bank 1 and bank 2 (P0171, P0174). over the course of a few months i changed the upper and lower boots, all vacuum lines, fuel filter, disa valve, cleaned the MAF, smoked the intake, replaced the CCV and hoses with no success... when I check my fuel trim, my Long Term trims were steady at ~ 10-14 throughout the RPM range.
when I replaced the MAF and put ~40 miles on it, my fuel trims are holding steady at ~ 1, success!!
so yes, a MAF can definitely soft-fail and appear as though it is working just fine when you observe the live data feed readings on your OBDII scanner. mine was apparently ~10% off throughout the rpm range, very precise, but not accurate (for all you engineers)!!!!!